Is the Majority Always Right - 1408 Words

Many of the societies we live in today are based on the majoritys decision, placing importance, and the right to make decisions, on the people, and their choices. Even in societies that do not function this way, the majoritys ways of thinking are reflected in how they act. Is this majority decision always right, however? Can the majority be trusted to make decisions and behave in ways that are considered right, moral, and justified? In my opinion, believing that the majority will always be right is a questionable and debatable belief, as it can often be a false assumption, and it should also be acknowledged that the majority itself will change over time, as will their beliefs. A well-known example of poor decisions made by the†¦show more content†¦These values create the idea of what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, the beliefs that are shared by the majority are the beliefs that are considered correct – in short, the majority separates what is right from what is wrong. So, what if who the majority was had changed? What if what the majority believed was different? It should be remembered that these alterations have, in fact, occurred. Therefore, still using the examples of racism against Japanese-Americans and Japanese-Canadians, the majority at that time believed that their actions were justified, that their nation was at war, and that these Japanese immigrants, who were from a nation that was Americas or Canadas enemy, could also, in turn, be their enemies. Therefore, they believed that their decision and actions were justified and the right thing to do, as well as there being less emphasis on human rights, resulting in few people t hinking that the Japanese immigrants were entitled to certain rights. This mindset also contributed to the Japanese losing their property – everything was sold, including their land, farms, possessions in their homes as well as their houses, fishing boats, and more – by the government. Since no, or at least few, objections were made against these actions, this decision was obviously right, because the majority had decided it was so. Also, it should be realized that the number of immigrants, and people of a non-Caucasian background in NorthShow MoreRelatedThe Concept Of Majority Rule With Minority Rights Essay1336 Words   |  6 Pagesof majority rule with minority rights. This is an idea formed from the principles of democracy that encompass American government. We must analyze democracy and compare it to the American government. Minority rights should be understood as those that are unalienable; human rights exempt from persecution. From this information, we will understand when, if ever, it is ok to impose one’s will over another Democracy is a government in which citizens make political decisions based on majority ruleRead MoreA Conversation About Justice Is A State Of Human Equality1198 Words   |  5 Pagesthere be justice for all? Is social justice fair or just what is appropriate for a particular situation? Does the majority have more say than the minority? Is the law always just? Can there be equality for the minority without taking privilege from the majority? Some would say democracy is just but there are many problems with the society determining what is just. One is, if the majority is allowed to create the terms of justice the ethics of minorities will usually be treated as less important, orRead MoreWomen in Society 963 Words   |  4 Pagesneeded to produce new life. In sexual assault and rape case women should always be treated differently then men. Because men 9 times out of 10 are stronger then women and can defend themselves better then women can. Women also should have the free choice to deiced what they want to do with their bodies in regards to medical and abortion rights. Since the beginning of the formation of the United States women in general have always been treated differently by men. Up until the 1920’s women really hadRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1659 Words   |  7 Pagesits myriad tasks. The government always makes a mark on its people. The actions of the government, while frequently ridiculed or vilified, are the results of the people themselves, operating within our system of government. So while many people may disapprove of the job Congress is doing or the direction the president is leading us in, the status quo remains the same. This is because our current state of affairs has been determined as a norm and agreed to by a majority. The following pages show howRead MoreDoes Democracy Ensure Freedom?1057 Words   |  5 Pagesbelieve democracy can ensure freedom, but not always, thus my answer is maybe. For democracy is a form of gover nment that rely on a system of law in which individuals are treated equally while having fair access to the legislative process through electing official who will act in their constituent’s interest and voice their concern. Through proper protection with legislation, individuals freedom can be ensured. Yet the nature of democracy favour majority thus it is possible for politician to caterRead MoreThoreau Civil Disobedience Summary1289 Words   |  6 Pagesstates that a government infrequently proves itself useful, as it is often backed up by the majority, instead of following what is truly right. Thoreau argues that people should not allow the government to overrule their consciousness, or make them persons of an injust practice. More importantly he wants his readers to take many of his ideas and put them to work, these things include, not being part of the majority, expressing their own opinion, and refusing to follow the law when unjust in a civil wayRead MoreHenry David T horeau s Civil Disobedience945 Words   |  4 Pagesand Mexican – American War. Henry David Thoreau’s consistently argued that government rarely proves they’re for the people and obtains its power from the majority because organization, however criticizes the legitimacy of governments viewpoints. Thoreau thoughts were people’s first option is to do what they believe is right and not to follow majority rule. If government is proven to be unjust, society should organize groups that refuses to follow laws and speak up until they’re heard. Separation fromRead MoreSocrates As A Moral Man1531 Words   |  7 Pagesdie for his beliefs of finding out the underling truth that the government tries to conceal from the people. The story presents an important question between Socrates and his friend Crito, as to whether the opinion of the majority is always right. A way we see how the majority works is in the political system. In one of the scenes in the story â€Å"Crito†, Socrates is lock up in jail, as the people in Athens believes he was corrupting the minds of the youth and inventing a new God which was impietyRead MoreEssay about Social Contract Theory1429 Words   |  6 Pagesthe job Congress is doing or the direction the president is leading us in, the status quo remains the same. This is because our current state of affairs, however twisted and convoluted it may be, has been determined as a norm, and agreed to by a majority. In the following pages I will show how modern social contract theory, especially that of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, grew into the divisive issue it is in contemporary political philosophy. I will do so by briefly unpacking the recent historyRead MoreEssay about Madisonian Majorities1643 Words   |  7 PagesSince time began, it has always been human nature for man to compete and win. Just like when it comes to majorities and minorities, majorities tend to overp ower minorities. Guinier makes a great point when she brings up, Madisonian Majorities, which are minorities working with the majority to achieve a solution. By working in this format, we could achieve so much more in much peaceful ways. Madisonian majorities could be best applied to a democracy, because both the majority and minority can work together